Showing posts with label report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label report. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Frustration builds up among Canadian family doctors

Faced with an aging population requiring increasingly complex care, overwhelmed Canadian doctors are feeling more and more frustrated by their inability to properly serve their patients' health needs, a national survey of physicians reports.

In the survey of more than 20,000 doctors and doctors-in-training from across the country, 75 per cent reported that inadequate funding of the health care system and an under-supply of physicians and other health professionals, along with paperwork and bureaucracy, are curtailing the amount and level of care they want to provide patients.

While that attitude was expressed by all the specialties, it is perhaps most pronounced among family physicians, simply because of their number and the nature of their practice, said Calvin Gutkin, executive director and CEO of the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Almost half of Canada's roughly 60,000 doctors are family practitioners, and it's usually the specialty seen most often by patients, he said.

"I think the frustration remains related to just the capacity within the family medicine community to address all of the needs of the population," said Dr. Gutkin, whose organization conducts the triennial survey jointly with the Canadian Medical Association and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

"Physicians in most communities across the country are doing their best to try to see as many patients as they can," he said.

"But still many of them have had to ... limit the number of new patients they can take. And we have community after community with patients who are unable to access a family physician for themselves or for their families. "

Read the rest of the story here

A related story about Calgary doctors can be read in here

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Statistics Canada underestimates our health care system, report says

Canadians are likely getting more value from the health care system than Statistics Canada's figures suggest, says an Ottawa-based think tank in a report criticizing the agency for shoddy estimates.

In a report to be released today and obtained by The Canadian Press, the Centre for the Study of Living Standards says Statistics Canada "may seriously underestimate" the health care system's true economic effectiveness.

It also says the agency "should devote more effort to develop better estimates of output and productivity."

"The true contribution of the health-care sector to the well-being of the Canadian population ... is not being captured in current estimates of health-care output and productivity," the report says.

Statistics Canada estimates productivity in the health care and social assistance industry fell 0.69 per cent per year from 1987-2006, the report says.

The report says that's in opposition to a 1.14 per cent increase in overall productivity in Canada during the same 20-year period.

"It is widely recognized, including by Statistics Canada officials, that these numbers may seriously underestimate the true contribution of the health-care sector to real output, and more importantly to the economic well-being of Canadians," it says.

Reached at his in-laws' house in Toronto, Andrew Sharpe, one of the authors of the report and the executive director of the centre, said the statistics agency's measurement system is flawed.

"It's an input-based measure that doesn't give you a true measure of the output of the sector," he said.

"So, there's a massive downward biased output in the health care sector in the official numbers."

The report notes several European countries and the United States are starting to measure actual output of their health care systems, and suggests Canada adopt this framework.

It suggests Statistics Canada's measurements might not fully account for improvements in the quality of health care. It notes life expectancy in Canada rose by 5.3 years from 1979 to 2004.

There will be "very different" policy implications depending on whether increased health spending stems from higher prices or improving quality, the report says.

Times&Transcript

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Surgical masks insufficient protection during flu pandemic

In a report released yesterday, a panel of experts said that surgical masks aren't adequate to protect people from becoming infected during an influenza pandemic,

The report, written for the Public Health Agency of Canada, suggested industrial respirators known as N95s, would be needed to minimize the risk of transmission of flu.

"Surgical masks don't really fit the bill," said Dr. Donald Low, chair of the panel which brought together infection control specialists, nurses and occupational health and safety experts.

"Even if they have a good filtering capacity, inhalable virus particles will take the route of least resistance, which will be around the mask and through the gap that exists between the surgical mask and the face, just because they're not affected by gravity"

The panel was asked to advise the public health agency on one of the most contentious issues in influenza science - how flu spreads.

The answer will be used to craft guidance for provinces and territories on what protective equipment they should consider stockpiling for health care workers in a pandemic as well as advice for the public on how to reduce the risk of getting sick in such an event.

Read the rest of the article from the Canadian Press here

Monday, December 10, 2007

New Brunswick health care workers highest absence rate

New Brunswick health care workers posted the highest absenteeism rates in the country last year, according to numbers released last Monday by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

Provincial health workers, ages 25 to 54, logged an average of 16.1 lost days in 2006.

That figure is more than double that of Alberta, which had the lowest numbers, at 7.2 lost days. Nova Scotia recorded a rate of 9.7. Manitoba placed second last, just ahead of New Brunswick, with an average of 16 days lost. The national average was 12 days.

The report, titled Canada’s Health Care Providers, notes such levels far exceed national averages for the general workforce.

Friday, December 7, 2007

Scarborough General Hospital highest death rate in the GTA

"Health care experts say the numbers will force medical officials to examine their practices and improve patient care".

Scarborough General Hospital has the highest rate of deaths in the Toronto area – and the third highest in Canada – according to a watershed report that made hospital death rates public last week.
It's the first time in history that a report of this kind this has been done.

The hospital with the lowest rate of deaths in the GTA is the University Health Network, which includes Princess Margaret, Toronto General and Toronto Western Hospitals.

The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) released mortality rates for 85 large Canadian acute care hospitals and 42 health regions in every province but Quebec, where they don't collect the same data. Health care experts say the figures, which show how effective hospitals are at avoiding preventable deaths, will force medical officials to examine their practices and improve patient care.

For years, Canadian hospital administrators have known what death rates were inside their hospitals, but unlike the United States and the United Kingdom, they were never made public.

The only hospital in the Greater Toronto Area that CIHI did not release figures for was the Humber River Regional Hospital.

"For this report we got our preliminary results back and when we saw them we said: Hold on, we've got some concerns here," said Gerrard Power, a hospital spokesperson.

"It's important all hospitals report the information so they can figure out the problems and fix them," said Dr. Alan Hudson, head of Ontario's wait time strategy.

"This is an absolutely crucial day for the province of Ontario. It is a major step," said Hudson, a neurosurgeon. "The whole process should be transparent. Taxpayers deserve nothing less."

The long-awaited disclosure follows a year-long Toronto Star investigation into medical secrecy that raised questions about a lack of public reporting in Canada. As part of the investigative series Medical Secrets, the Star urged CIHI to reveal hospital names with reportable data.

The provincial government has mandated that the 1st of April 2008 all Ontario hospitals report adverse events and death rates for certain procedures on their websites along with wait time information.

The CIHI study compares the actual number of deaths in hospital with the average Canadian experience. The numerical result is called the hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR). A score above 100 means a hospital is above the national average while a score below that figure reflects a lower mortality rate.

The University Health Network scored an 87, or 13 points below the national average of 100. For years, the UHN has reported patient safety data on its website, from hospital-borne infection rates to wait times.

The UHN has also brought in rapid response care teams, which have helped to bring down death rates at its hospitals. These are groups of intensive care doctors and nurses that can quickly respond to a patient experiencing anything from a cardiac arrest to a drastic drop in blood pressure.

Bell has been a vocal supporter of publicizing death rates. "The data reflects the comparative experience of patients in your hospital related to other hospitals," he explained. "This gives hospital caregivers and managers a concrete goal they can set objectives with and they can use to initiate quality improvements."

Many experts believe public reporting allows hospitals to compare patient outcome records, see where they rank on important indicators and spot trends that could lead to changes that better protect public safety. Public reporting also provides patients with access to information about potential risks and problems inside their local hospitals before they seek treatment.

The Scarborough Hospital's General site scored 134, while the Grace site scored 110. The hospital has suffered from management turmoil, as well as allegations of lax oversight of physicians.

Dr. Steven Jackson, chief of medical staff at the hospital, said management is committed to lowering the numbers and beating the national average. "Everyone is buying into this," he said. "Quality is where we are going."

The figures released last week are viewed as a key indicator of patient safety levels in hospitals, an area of growing interest for medical experts. Between 9,250 and 23,750 Canadian adults experience a "preventable" adverse event in hospital and later die, according to a 2004 CIHI study. Over the past three years – the period covered by the new data – more than 254,000 patients died in Canadian hospitals outside Quebec.

"Releasing these numbers across Canada is a big step forward," said Hilary Short, president of the Ontario Hospital Association, representing all hospitals in the province. "It's hard the first time you release a report like this," she said. "But once you start reporting publicly it really accelerates ... and it forces improvement."

Now, for the numbers:

Canada's best and worst

The following hospitals had mortality ratios (excluding palliative care) ranking at the top and bottom of the list of 85 larger, acute care hospitals in 42 health regions across Canada (excluding Quebec), according to the CIHI survey of hospital deaths.

Top Five

1. The Moncton Hospital - Moncton, N.B.: 56

2. Foothills Medical Centre - Calgary, Alta.: 61

3. Regina General Hospital - Regina, Sask.: 71

4. Peter Lougheed Centre - Calgary, Alta.: 73

5. Saint John Regional Hospital - Saint John, N.B.: 74

Bottom Five

1. Grand River Hospital - K.W. Health Centre, Kitchener, Ont: 142

2. Niagara Health System - St. Catharines General Site, St. Catharines, Ont.: 135

3. The Scarborough Hospital - General Site, Toronto, Ont.: 134

4. Burnaby Hospital - Burnaby, B.C.: 125

5. Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre - Red Deer, Alta.: 125

The Moncton Hospital, N.B. - "lowest death rate in Canada"